Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

LOST

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of LOST.

Characters

The dataset has 15 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
87.1James 'Sawyer' Ford
86.0Jack Shephard
83.1John Locke
82.0Sayid Jarrah
73.8Charlie Pace
73.7Kate Austen
72.9Jin-Soo Kwon
68.9Desmond Hume
67.1Benjamin Linus
66.9Hugo 'Hurley' Reyes
60.5Sun-Hwa Kwon
56.4Juliet Burke
51.1Michael Dawson
46.0Claire Littleton
25.6Shannon Rutherford

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
25%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate LOST?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 35
2 It's bad 59
3 It's okay 987
4 It's good 2426
5 It's my favorite 670

This gives it an average score of 3.87 / 5. Making it 202nd out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.85
Female 3.88

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
angelic (not demonic)0.09354174
nurturing (not poisonous)0.06644186
deep (not shallow)0.06384308
reasonable (not deranged)0.05834198
nerd (not jock)0.04874196
genius (not dunce)0.04254250
gracious (not feisty)0.04184178
disarming (not creepy)0.0394192
obedient (not rebellious)0.03794289
sheriff (not outlaw)0.03764181
lenient (not strict)0.03694263
intimate (not formal)0.03674300
orderly (not chaotic)0.03514249
stylish (not slovenly)0.03424297
loyal (not traitorous)0.03394370
altruistic (not selfish)0.03324188
tame (not wild)0.02852888
social (not reclusive)0.02724189
genuine (not sarcastic)0.02492982
emotional (not logical)0.0224361
mature (not juvenile)0.02192845
stinky (not fresh)0.02044184
frugal (not lavish)0.01784172
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.01624187
awkward (not charming)0.01484363
bossy (not meek)0.01384191
indulgent (not sober)0.00934175
blue-collar (not ivory-tower)0.00844164
feminine (not masculine)0.00664379
haunted (not blissful)0.00662863
conventional (not creative)0.0064368
spiritual (not skeptical)0.00524353
arcane (not mainstream)0.00314182
alpha (not beta)0.00314179
high-tech (not low-tech)0.00212985
scientific (not artistic)0.00153062

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy