Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

La La Land

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of La La Land.

Characters

The dataset has 2 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
77.8Sebastian Wilder
77.5Mia Dolan

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
24%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate La La Land?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 10
2 It's bad 27
3 It's okay 288
4 It's good 856
5 It's my favorite 290

This gives it an average score of 3.94 / 5. Making it 151st out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 4.06
Female 3.93

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
angelic (not demonic)0.11821552
gracious (not feisty)0.11341554
nurturing (not poisonous)0.10991555
altruistic (not selfish)0.10961553
artistic (not scientific)0.09111568
reasonable (not deranged)0.07641589
disarming (not creepy)0.07611567
obedient (not rebellious)0.07531553
nerd (not jock)0.07331574
mature (not juvenile)0.07261574
deep (not shallow)0.07221571
indulgent (not sober)0.06431556
lenient (not strict)0.06161590
loyal (not traitorous)0.06031569
genuine (not sarcastic)0.05831556
intimate (not formal)0.05691554
stylish (not slovenly)0.05291556
creative (not conventional)0.05241576
blissful (not haunted)0.04761549
sheriff (not outlaw)0.04571550
arcane (not mainstream)0.04231571
emotional (not logical)0.03931568
beta (not alpha)0.0391551
meek (not bossy)0.03231574
fresh (not stinky)0.02651555
tame (not wild)0.02631573
frugal (not lavish)0.02451552
social (not reclusive)0.0241555
ivory-tower (not blue-collar)0.01741546
high-tech (not low-tech)0.01611549
spiritual (not skeptical)0.0161554
genius (not dunce)0.01421556
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.01051555
awkward (not charming)0.01041575
orderly (not chaotic)0.00931553
masculine (not feminine)0.00051583

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy