Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Sex Education

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Sex Education.

Characters

The dataset has 10 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
82.7Maeve Wiley
82.3Jean Milburn
80.7Eric Effiong
77.0Aimee Gibbs
73.1Otis Milburn
69.2Adam Groff
63.0Jackson Marchetti
54.8Lily Iglehart
51.1Ola Nyman
48.8Michael Groff

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
46%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Sex Education?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 16
2 It's bad 46
3 It's okay 808
4 It's good 4086
5 It's my favorite 978

This gives it an average score of 4.01 / 5. Making it 107th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.97
Female 4.01

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
nurturing (not poisonous)0.07756463
altruistic (not selfish)0.07096473
lenient (not strict)0.06226617
loyal (not traitorous)0.05646510
creative (not conventional)0.05276588
disarming (not creepy)0.05096503
deep (not shallow)0.05046575
intimate (not formal)0.0476472
indulgent (not sober)0.03926465
artistic (not scientific)0.03526580
social (not reclusive)0.03376469
reasonable (not deranged)0.03346619
nerd (not jock)0.03156573
angelic (not demonic)0.03116465
emotional (not logical)0.02976502
stylish (not slovenly)0.02766472
awkward (not charming)0.02666574
genuine (not sarcastic)0.02586466
blissful (not haunted)0.02576452
mature (not juvenile)0.02026587
feminine (not masculine)0.01966611
fresh (not stinky)0.01886463
high-tech (not low-tech)0.01836456
sheriff (not outlaw)0.01596465
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.01376474
frugal (not lavish)0.01366437
beta (not alpha)0.0136459
feisty (not gracious)0.01226462
tame (not wild)0.01056580
orderly (not chaotic)0.00926468
spiritual (not skeptical)0.00896465
obedient (not rebellious)0.00866463
dunce (not genius)0.00446459
mainstream (not arcane)0.00366497
blue-collar (not ivory-tower)0.0036435
meek (not bossy)0.00066576

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy