Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Ratatouille

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Ratatouille.

Characters

The dataset has 3 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
90.1Remy
63.3Alfredo Linguini
50.7Chef Skinner

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
54%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Ratatouille?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 11
2 It's bad 32
3 It's okay 1759
4 It's good 6247
5 It's my favorite 1153

This gives it an average score of 3.92 / 5. Making it 167th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.97
Female 3.92

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
nurturing (not poisonous)0.08539683
nerd (not jock)0.07379774
angelic (not demonic)0.07239686
altruistic (not selfish)0.06879691
genuine (not sarcastic)0.06517418
meek (not bossy)0.05999774
disarming (not creepy)0.05659757
lenient (not strict)0.05159933
loyal (not traitorous)0.049510019
deep (not shallow)0.04829921
creative (not conventional)0.047410042
arcane (not mainstream)0.04339720
gracious (not feisty)0.04329682
reasonable (not deranged)0.04159821
artistic (not scientific)0.03997609
obedient (not rebellious)0.03859843
beta (not alpha)0.0359678
intimate (not formal)0.0359852
tame (not wild)0.02997332
emotional (not logical)0.028510008
orderly (not chaotic)0.02639808
reclusive (not social)0.02449702
blissful (not haunted)0.02317236
low-tech (not high-tech)0.02257395
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.02099706
masculine (not feminine)0.019510096
mature (not juvenile)0.01587197
blue-collar (not ivory-tower)0.01339638
indulgent (not sober)0.01179689
frugal (not lavish)0.01119668
spiritual (not skeptical)0.01079949
outlaw (not sheriff)0.00489671
fresh (not stinky)0.00419684
awkward (not charming)0.003710034
dunce (not genius)0.00279815
slovenly (not stylish)0.00019837

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy