Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Emily in Paris

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Emily in Paris.

Characters

The dataset has 6 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
80.6Sylvie Grateau
69.5Emily Cooper
68.7Gabriel
63.0Mindy Chen
43.1Julien
40.2Luc

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
18%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Emily in Paris?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 117
2 It's bad 347
3 It's okay 1204
4 It's good 1269
5 It's my favorite 126

This gives it an average score of 3.31 / 5. Making it 334th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.29
Female 3.31

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
blissful (not haunted)0.13633172
mainstream (not arcane)0.12323178
feminine (not masculine)0.11923215
jock (not nerd)0.11083202
high-tech (not low-tech)0.10063172
angelic (not demonic)0.09323171
fresh (not stinky)0.0873166
social (not reclusive)0.08683171
bossy (not meek)0.08073206
alpha (not beta)0.07923165
charming (not awkward)0.07843200
lavish (not frugal)0.07543155
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.07463172
spiritual (not skeptical)0.06913167
mature (not juvenile)0.0633207
emotional (not logical)0.05983183
loyal (not traitorous)0.05153177
sheriff (not outlaw)0.04793165
sober (not indulgent)0.04753162
wild (not tame)0.04553197
disarming (not creepy)0.04233185
stylish (not slovenly)0.03863170
nurturing (not poisonous)0.03273171
conventional (not creative)0.03163202
orderly (not chaotic)0.03143171
reasonable (not deranged)0.02663213
scientific (not artistic)0.02513204
genuine (not sarcastic)0.02413168
selfish (not altruistic)0.01363174
ivory-tower (not blue-collar)0.01333161
dunce (not genius)0.0133172
strict (not lenient)0.01153214
obedient (not rebellious)0.00933170
shallow (not deep)0.00413205
formal (not intimate)0.00323171
feisty (not gracious)0.00033176

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy