Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Better Call Saul

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Better Call Saul.

Characters

The dataset has 6 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
94.4Mike Ehrmantraut
80.0Kim Wexler
79.8Chuck McGill
74.7Jimmy McGill
65.6Nacho Varga
59.9Howard Hamlin

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
23%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Better Call Saul?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 10
2 It's bad 20
3 It's okay 469
4 It's good 1824
5 It's my favorite 628

This gives it an average score of 4.03 / 5. Making it 91st out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 4.13
Female 3.94

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
nerd (not jock)0.14053000
masculine (not feminine)0.10593101
tame (not wild)0.10541558
skeptical (not spiritual)0.10383080
beta (not alpha)0.10382984
reclusive (not social)0.09822989
stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous)0.08242989
genuine (not sarcastic)0.07611594
meek (not bossy)0.07583004
stinky (not fresh)0.07352991
genius (not dunce)0.06843028
slovenly (not stylish)0.06463038
haunted (not blissful)0.05931543
gracious (not feisty)0.05872986
frugal (not lavish)0.04132986
orderly (not chaotic)0.04053019
reasonable (not deranged)0.03983016
arcane (not mainstream)0.03913002
awkward (not charming)0.03873092
juvenile (not mature)0.03491529
sheriff (not outlaw)0.02762984
scientific (not artistic)0.02291647
lenient (not strict)0.02143051
altruistic (not selfish)0.0212988
logical (not emotional)0.01923088
obedient (not rebellious)0.01783040
deep (not shallow)0.01763053
sober (not indulgent)0.01762982
nurturing (not poisonous)0.01632983
demonic (not angelic)0.01462979
traitorous (not loyal)0.01163091
creepy (not disarming)0.00762995
high-tech (not low-tech)0.00721595
blue-collar (not ivory-tower)0.00572977
conventional (not creative)0.00233096
formal (not intimate)0.00013037

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy