Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.

Characters

The dataset has 3 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
87.4Blondie
78.1Angel Eyes
51.7Tuco

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
22%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 31
2 It's bad 23
3 It's okay 293
4 It's good 779
5 It's my favorite 232

This gives it an average score of 3.85 / 5. Making it 215th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 4.08
Female 3.55

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
masculine (not feminine)0.2741438
nerd (not jock)0.16041396
tame (not wild)0.1521739
reclusive (not social)0.15171384
arcane (not mainstream)0.14521385
frugal (not lavish)0.13951383
slovenly (not stylish)0.12771410
logical (not emotional)0.12721434
skeptical (not spiritual)0.10071428
stinky (not fresh)0.09881383
low-tech (not high-tech)0.0907756
nurturing (not poisonous)0.08191386
haunted (not blissful)0.0721730
reasonable (not deranged)0.06791396
gracious (not feisty)0.06431380
loyal (not traitorous)0.05941433
meek (not bossy)0.05641393
stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous)0.05641380
angelic (not demonic)0.05011380
genius (not dunce)0.04651400
deep (not shallow)0.04581420
formal (not intimate)0.04021413
awkward (not charming)0.03691436
scientific (not artistic)0.0338787
genuine (not sarcastic)0.0331757
sheriff (not outlaw)0.0331378
orderly (not chaotic)0.02811398
beta (not alpha)0.02281387
blue-collar (not ivory-tower)0.02251384
lenient (not strict)0.02121415
altruistic (not selfish)0.0161384
creepy (not disarming)0.01251386
rebellious (not obedient)0.00541412
indulgent (not sober)0.00511382
conventional (not creative)0.0051439
mature (not juvenile)0.002705

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy