The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Star Trek: The Next Generation.
| Notability | Name |
|---|---|
| 94.7 | Jean-Luc Picard |
| 90.4 | Data |
| 80.8 | Deanna Troi |
| 80.4 | Guinan |
| 79.7 | William Riker |
| 78.9 | Geordi La Forge |
| 78.0 | Worf |
| 74.2 | Beverly Crusher |
| 49.9 | Tasha Yar |
| 44.5 | Wesley Crusher |
To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.
As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Star Trek: The Next Generation?". The distribution of their responses are below.
| # | Response | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | It's the worst | 0 |
| 2 | It's bad | 10 |
| 3 | It's okay | 299 |
| 4 | It's good | 1935 |
| 5 | It's my favorite | 715 |
This gives it an average score of 4.13 / 5. Making it 69th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.
The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in general in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of the quiz are biased towards being women and being younger. To kind of explore this idea, we can correlate user ratings with responses to the self-report personality quiz to see what type of people give this universe higher ratings. The table below show the correlation between a users response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.
| Item | Correlation with rating | n |
|---|---|---|
| nerd (not jock) | 0.108 | 2691 |
| reasonable (not deranged) | 0.092 | 2690 |
| tame (not wild) | 0.081 | 1013 |
| nurturing (not poisonous) | 0.076 | 2663 |
| scientific (not artistic) | 0.068 | 1264 |
| juvenile (not mature) | 0.058 | 1006 |
| altruistic (not selfish) | 0.052 | 2686 |
| disarming (not creepy) | 0.045 | 2640 |
| angelic (not demonic) | 0.043 | 2636 |
| loyal (not traitorous) | 0.043 | 2932 |
| frugal (not lavish) | 0.043 | 2659 |
| genius (not dunce) | 0.039 | 2734 |
| intimate (not formal) | 0.039 | 2848 |
| deep (not shallow) | 0.038 | 2865 |
| genuine (not sarcastic) | 0.037 | 1208 |
| sheriff (not outlaw) | 0.035 | 2667 |
| blue-collar (not ivory-tower) | 0.034 | 2632 |
| slovenly (not stylish) | 0.034 | 2868 |
| beta (not alpha) | 0.031 | 2595 |
| indulgent (not sober) | 0.027 | 2666 |
| stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous) | 0.027 | 2684 |
| skeptical (not spiritual) | 0.026 | 2924 |
| gracious (not feisty) | 0.023 | 2666 |
| high-tech (not low-tech) | 0.022 | 1200 |
| reclusive (not social) | 0.02 | 2687 |
| arcane (not mainstream) | 0.019 | 2656 |
| lenient (not strict) | 0.018 | 2736 |
| orderly (not chaotic) | 0.015 | 2734 |
| haunted (not blissful) | 0.012 | 987 |
| meek (not bossy) | 0.009 | 2686 |
| awkward (not charming) | 0.008 | 2937 |
| fresh (not stinky) | 0.008 | 2654 |
| obedient (not rebellious) | 0.006 | 2877 |
| masculine (not feminine) | 0.006 | 2928 |
| emotional (not logical) | 0.005 | 2927 |
| conventional (not creative) | 0.0 | 2938 |