Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

WandaVision characters personality data for the Statistical Quiz

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of WandaVision. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What WandaVision character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.

Characters

The dataset has 3 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
93.5Wanda Maximoff
70.35Vision
60.0Agatha Harkness

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 16 and 60 years of age).
42% 0%
16
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate WandaVision?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 16
2 It's bad 54
3 It's okay 1337
4 It's good 6394
5 It's my favorite 1847

This gives it an average score of 4.04 / 5. Making it 89th out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.9
Female 4.06

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
feminine (not masculine)0.078910660
emotional (not logical)0.062610552
spiritual (not skeptical)0.061610521
stylish (not slovenly)0.042710477
artistic (not scientific)0.040610643
loyal (not traitorous)0.039210560
nurturing (not poisonous)0.037510486
nerd (not jock)0.035710600
deep (not shallow)0.034410597
fresh (not stinky)0.033210481
creative (not conventional)0.032810645
high-tech (not low-tech)0.030410479
altruistic (not selfish)0.028710484
genius (not dunce)0.027710527
feisty (not gracious)0.027210485
mainstream (not arcane)0.027210505
disarming (not creepy)0.026710506
chaotic (not orderly)0.024110518
mature (not juvenile)0.024110598
intimate (not formal)0.022210488
sarcastic (not genuine)0.020410492
angelic (not demonic)0.019310473
lavish (not frugal)0.01710444
awkward (not charming)0.016610646
reasonable (not deranged)0.016210647
bossy (not meek)0.015810599
social (not reclusive)0.014210490
indulgent (not sober)0.013810484
wild (not tame)0.011210611
ivory-tower (not blue-collar)0.010710437
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.009510495
blissful (not haunted)0.007510478
obedient (not rebellious)0.006910489
alpha (not beta)0.002810458
strict (not lenient)0.002210675
sheriff (not outlaw)0.001710474

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 24 February 2026
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy