Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Broad City characters personality data for the Statistical Quiz

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of Broad City. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What Broad City character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.

Characters

The dataset has 3 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
84.55Ilana Wexler
70.85Abbi Abrams
39.9Lincoln Rice

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 16 and 60 years of age).
13% 0%
16
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Broad City?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 10
2 It's bad 3
3 It's okay 160
4 It's good 1371
5 It's my favorite 513

This gives it an average score of 4.15 / 5. Making it 31st out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 4.03
Female 4.18

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
nurturing (not poisonous)0.10472364
loyal (not traitorous)0.08272373
disarming (not creepy)0.08242371
intimate (not formal)0.08042365
indulgent (not sober)0.07812363
feminine (not masculine)0.06912388
emotional (not logical)0.06362368
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.06052368
altruistic (not selfish)0.04842362
wild (not tame)0.04562383
lenient (not strict)0.04552391
feisty (not gracious)0.0452364
outlaw (not sheriff)0.04142365
artistic (not scientific)0.03732391
social (not reclusive)0.03732363
nerd (not jock)0.03492385
ivory-tower (not blue-collar)0.03472360
lavish (not frugal)0.03422362
genuine (not sarcastic)0.03332366
mature (not juvenile)0.02982385
low-tech (not high-tech)0.02962363
chaotic (not orderly)0.0282364
creative (not conventional)0.02442387
rebellious (not obedient)0.0222365
reasonable (not deranged)0.0222391
spiritual (not skeptical)0.02162364
blissful (not haunted)0.01772362
stylish (not slovenly)0.01712369
beta (not alpha)0.01612361
mainstream (not arcane)0.01562368
bossy (not meek)0.01382385
deep (not shallow)0.00842388
fresh (not stinky)0.00692369
dunce (not genius)0.00642368
angelic (not demonic)0.00142365
charming (not awkward)0.00072386

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 24 February 2026
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy