The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of Better Call Saul. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What Better Call Saul character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.
| Notability | Name |
|---|---|
| 94.4 | Mike Ehrmantraut |
| 80.0 | Kim Wexler |
| 79.8 | Chuck McGill |
| 74.7 | Jimmy McGill |
| 65.6 | Nacho Varga |
| 59.9 | Howard Hamlin |
To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.
As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Better Call Saul?". The distribution of their responses are below.
| # | Response | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | It's the worst | 10 |
| 2 | It's bad | 20 |
| 3 | It's okay | 469 |
| 4 | It's good | 1824 |
| 5 | It's my favorite | 628 |
This gives it an average score of 4.03 / 5. Making it 91st out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.
The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.
There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:
| Gender | Average rating |
|---|---|
| Male | 4.13 |
| Female | 3.94 |
The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.
| Item | Correlation with rating | n |
|---|---|---|
| nerd (not jock) | 0.1405 | 3000 |
| masculine (not feminine) | 0.1059 | 3101 |
| tame (not wild) | 0.1054 | 1558 |
| skeptical (not spiritual) | 0.1038 | 3080 |
| beta (not alpha) | 0.1038 | 2984 |
| reclusive (not social) | 0.0982 | 2989 |
| stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous) | 0.0824 | 2989 |
| genuine (not sarcastic) | 0.0761 | 1594 |
| meek (not bossy) | 0.0758 | 3004 |
| stinky (not fresh) | 0.0735 | 2991 |
| genius (not dunce) | 0.0684 | 3028 |
| slovenly (not stylish) | 0.0646 | 3038 |
| haunted (not blissful) | 0.0593 | 1543 |
| gracious (not feisty) | 0.0587 | 2986 |
| frugal (not lavish) | 0.0413 | 2986 |
| orderly (not chaotic) | 0.0405 | 3019 |
| reasonable (not deranged) | 0.0398 | 3016 |
| arcane (not mainstream) | 0.0391 | 3002 |
| awkward (not charming) | 0.0387 | 3092 |
| juvenile (not mature) | 0.0349 | 1529 |
| sheriff (not outlaw) | 0.0276 | 2984 |
| scientific (not artistic) | 0.0229 | 1647 |
| lenient (not strict) | 0.0214 | 3051 |
| altruistic (not selfish) | 0.021 | 2988 |
| logical (not emotional) | 0.0192 | 3088 |
| obedient (not rebellious) | 0.0178 | 3040 |
| deep (not shallow) | 0.0176 | 3053 |
| sober (not indulgent) | 0.0176 | 2982 |
| nurturing (not poisonous) | 0.0163 | 2983 |
| demonic (not angelic) | 0.0146 | 2979 |
| traitorous (not loyal) | 0.0116 | 3091 |
| creepy (not disarming) | 0.0076 | 2995 |
| high-tech (not low-tech) | 0.0072 | 1595 |
| blue-collar (not ivory-tower) | 0.0057 | 2977 |
| conventional (not creative) | 0.0023 | 3096 |
| formal (not intimate) | 0.0001 | 3037 |
How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are: