The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of Better Call Saul. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What Better Call Saul character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.
| Notability | Name |
|---|---|
| 77.8 | Jimmy McGill |
| 70.4 | Mike Ehrmantraut |
| 69.8 | Kim Wexler |
| 56.55 | Chuck McGill |
| 52.5 | Nacho Varga |
| 39.55 | Howard Hamlin |
To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.
As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Better Call Saul?". The distribution of their responses are below.
| # | Response | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | It's the worst | 13 |
| 2 | It's bad | 23 |
| 3 | It's okay | 579 |
| 4 | It's good | 2435 |
| 5 | It's my favorite | 931 |
This gives it an average score of 4.07 / 5. Making it 74th out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.
The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.
There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:
| Gender | Average rating |
|---|---|
| Male | 4.16 |
| Female | 3.98 |
The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.
| Item | Correlation with rating | n |
|---|---|---|
| nerd (not jock) | 0.1235 | 4123 |
| skeptical (not spiritual) | 0.1 | 4202 |
| masculine (not feminine) | 0.098 | 4232 |
| beta (not alpha) | 0.092 | 4094 |
| reclusive (not social) | 0.0821 | 4099 |
| tame (not wild) | 0.0783 | 2679 |
| stinky (not fresh) | 0.0756 | 4100 |
| meek (not bossy) | 0.0724 | 4123 |
| haunted (not blissful) | 0.0723 | 2654 |
| stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous) | 0.0687 | 4101 |
| genius (not dunce) | 0.0594 | 4151 |
| slovenly (not stylish) | 0.0577 | 4150 |
| gracious (not feisty) | 0.0556 | 4098 |
| genuine (not sarcastic) | 0.0543 | 2700 |
| awkward (not charming) | 0.0488 | 4224 |
| arcane (not mainstream) | 0.0369 | 4113 |
| lenient (not strict) | 0.0353 | 4183 |
| reasonable (not deranged) | 0.0338 | 4139 |
| deep (not shallow) | 0.0318 | 4176 |
| orderly (not chaotic) | 0.0293 | 4144 |
| traitorous (not loyal) | 0.0267 | 4218 |
| altruistic (not selfish) | 0.0264 | 4099 |
| juvenile (not mature) | 0.0238 | 2650 |
| logical (not emotional) | 0.0234 | 4212 |
| creepy (not disarming) | 0.0207 | 4106 |
| obedient (not rebellious) | 0.0183 | 4150 |
| frugal (not lavish) | 0.0182 | 4097 |
| scientific (not artistic) | 0.0173 | 2781 |
| sheriff (not outlaw) | 0.0172 | 4094 |
| intimate (not formal) | 0.0166 | 4149 |
| demonic (not angelic) | 0.0152 | 4086 |
| high-tech (not low-tech) | 0.0029 | 2709 |
| indulgent (not sober) | 0.0028 | 4094 |
| poisonous (not nurturing) | 0.0017 | 4096 |
| conventional (not creative) | 0.0011 | 4232 |
| blue-collar (not ivory-tower) | 0.0004 | 4087 |
How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are: