Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt.

Characters

The dataset has 5 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
84.7Titus Andromedon
75.7Lillian Kaushtupper
73.5Kimmy Schmidt
64.6Jacqueline White
26.8Cyndee Pokorny

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
24%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 7
2 It's bad 45
3 It's okay 728
4 It's good 1698
5 It's my favorite 188

This gives it an average score of 3.76 / 5. Making it 266th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.83
Female 3.75

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
nurturing (not poisonous)0.09792795
genuine (not sarcastic)0.08972240
nerd (not jock)0.07042810
altruistic (not selfish)0.06452790
creative (not conventional)0.06322900
obedient (not rebellious)0.05112836
artistic (not scientific)0.04912298
reasonable (not deranged)0.04342823
meek (not bossy)0.04212812
disarming (not creepy)0.0412796
angelic (not demonic)0.042784
blue-collar (not ivory-tower)0.03932782
slovenly (not stylish)0.03572838
loyal (not traitorous)0.03412880
tame (not wild)0.02642218
gracious (not feisty)0.02582790
high-tech (not low-tech)0.02362238
spiritual (not skeptical)0.02362865
arcane (not mainstream)0.02322789
beta (not alpha)0.0232786
reclusive (not social)0.02142794
intimate (not formal)0.02092843
fresh (not stinky)0.01642794
genius (not dunce)0.0162828
awkward (not charming)0.01582891
emotional (not logical)0.01452879
stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous)0.01272792
deep (not shallow)0.01232859
lenient (not strict)0.01212859
indulgent (not sober)0.0112787
haunted (not blissful)0.01092188
mature (not juvenile)0.00752156
lavish (not frugal)0.00312782
sheriff (not outlaw)0.00282790
chaotic (not orderly)0.00252825
masculine (not feminine)0.0012904

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy