Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Twilight

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Twilight.

Characters

The dataset has 10 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
82.7Alice Cullen
79.1Edward Cullen
76.8Carlisle Cullen
65.7Jacob Black
63.3Bella Swan
53.9Charlie Swan
53.7Jasper Hale
53.1Rosalie Hale
44.4Esme Cullen
39.3Emmett Cullen

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
55%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Twilight?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 147
2 It's bad 658
3 It's okay 3437
4 It's good 4696
5 It's my favorite 1962

This gives it an average score of 3.7 / 5. Making it 287th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.4
Female 3.72

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
spiritual (not skeptical)0.128711370
feminine (not masculine)0.126211556
emotional (not logical)0.100411433
lavish (not frugal)0.08511049
jock (not nerd)0.079111233
fresh (not stinky)0.078611112
stylish (not slovenly)0.071611257
social (not reclusive)0.065311122
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.062611114
bossy (not meek)0.058711232
blissful (not haunted)0.05768466
artistic (not scientific)0.05088880
intimate (not formal)0.04411263
mainstream (not arcane)0.043611129
angelic (not demonic)0.040911077
high-tech (not low-tech)0.04088615
wild (not tame)0.03988613
alpha (not beta)0.034811092
charming (not awkward)0.033811500
feisty (not gracious)0.033711095
disarming (not creepy)0.030911153
dunce (not genius)0.025811237
loyal (not traitorous)0.025711448
mature (not juvenile)0.02568399
lenient (not strict)0.020211427
indulgent (not sober)0.018811099
orderly (not chaotic)0.017411252
outlaw (not sheriff)0.01511077
deranged (not reasonable)0.011911268
nurturing (not poisonous)0.010511099
creative (not conventional)0.010211520
obedient (not rebellious)0.005611237
genuine (not sarcastic)0.00548643
blue-collar (not ivory-tower)0.004711052
shallow (not deep)0.00311361
selfish (not altruistic)0.002711118

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy