Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Space Force

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Space Force.

Characters

The dataset has 6 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
85.7Dr. Adrian Mallory
78.1Dr. Chan Kaifang
77.9Captain Angela Ali
74.9General Mark R. Naird
57.1Erin Naird
32.8F. Tony Scarapiducci

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
9%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Space Force?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 14
2 It's bad 25
3 It's okay 392
4 It's good 703
5 It's my favorite 47

This gives it an average score of 3.63 / 5. Making it 308th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.61
Female 3.64

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
nurturing (not poisonous)0.07661204
disarming (not creepy)0.07581218
nerd (not jock)0.06961209
sarcastic (not genuine)0.06111018
indulgent (not sober)0.05481203
low-tech (not high-tech)0.05161016
reclusive (not social)0.04991206
bossy (not meek)0.04941212
mature (not juvenile)0.0465990
blue-collar (not ivory-tower)0.04521206
loyal (not traitorous)0.04491249
scientific (not artistic)0.03411037
stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous)0.03321206
obedient (not rebellious)0.03021224
skeptical (not spiritual)0.02921236
lenient (not strict)0.02761239
tame (not wild)0.02621003
awkward (not charming)0.02391245
reasonable (not deranged)0.02321222
altruistic (not selfish)0.02011207
angelic (not demonic)0.01981203
frugal (not lavish)0.01921203
intimate (not formal)0.01591226
stylish (not slovenly)0.01481222
arcane (not mainstream)0.01361217
feminine (not masculine)0.01311259
fresh (not stinky)0.01181201
haunted (not blissful)0.0105992
orderly (not chaotic)0.00991219
sheriff (not outlaw)0.00871204
genius (not dunce)0.00781219
emotional (not logical)0.00571246
gracious (not feisty)0.00541206
shallow (not deep)0.00381230
creative (not conventional)0.00241246
alpha (not beta)0.0011208

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy