The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of Sleepless in Seattle. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What Sleepless in Seattle character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.
| Notability | Name |
|---|---|
| 78.9 | Sam Baldwin |
| 78.75 | Annie Reed |
To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.
As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Sleepless in Seattle?". The distribution of their responses are below.
| # | Response | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | It's the worst | 9 |
| 2 | It's bad | 26 |
| 3 | It's okay | 443 |
| 4 | It's good | 1086 |
| 5 | It's my favorite | 141 |
This gives it an average score of 3.78 / 5. Making it 268th out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.
The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.
There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:
| Gender | Average rating |
|---|---|
| Male | 3.66 |
| Female | 3.79 |
The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.
| Item | Correlation with rating | n |
|---|---|---|
| nurturing (not poisonous) | 0.1914 | 1832 |
| reasonable (not deranged) | 0.1485 | 1846 |
| angelic (not demonic) | 0.1356 | 1831 |
| disarming (not creepy) | 0.1266 | 1834 |
| sheriff (not outlaw) | 0.1079 | 1831 |
| mature (not juvenile) | 0.1074 | 1847 |
| genuine (not sarcastic) | 0.1057 | 1832 |
| loyal (not traitorous) | 0.0993 | 1837 |
| spiritual (not skeptical) | 0.0977 | 1831 |
| blissful (not haunted) | 0.0947 | 1831 |
| orderly (not chaotic) | 0.0909 | 1834 |
| gracious (not feisty) | 0.0792 | 1827 |
| feminine (not masculine) | 0.0777 | 1853 |
| altruistic (not selfish) | 0.0756 | 1830 |
| obedient (not rebellious) | 0.0756 | 1831 |
| tame (not wild) | 0.075 | 1848 |
| charming (not awkward) | 0.0627 | 1852 |
| stylish (not slovenly) | 0.0599 | 1829 |
| fresh (not stinky) | 0.0585 | 1835 |
| deep (not shallow) | 0.057 | 1850 |
| mainstream (not arcane) | 0.056 | 1837 |
| nerd (not jock) | 0.0548 | 1849 |
| intimate (not formal) | 0.0499 | 1831 |
| emotional (not logical) | 0.0485 | 1838 |
| artistic (not scientific) | 0.0458 | 1854 |
| lenient (not strict) | 0.0406 | 1853 |
| meek (not bossy) | 0.0373 | 1848 |
| social (not reclusive) | 0.0373 | 1827 |
| blue-collar (not ivory-tower) | 0.0332 | 1831 |
| adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud) | 0.0306 | 1830 |
| beta (not alpha) | 0.0269 | 1828 |
| genius (not dunce) | 0.0231 | 1830 |
| creative (not conventional) | 0.0223 | 1850 |
| low-tech (not high-tech) | 0.0217 | 1828 |
| sober (not indulgent) | 0.011 | 1829 |
| lavish (not frugal) | 0.0023 | 1831 |
How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are: