Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Sense8

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Sense8.

Characters

The dataset has 10 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
92.8Nomi Marks
84.8Sun Bak
83.2Wolfgang Bogdanow
79.4Riley Blue
77.9Amanita Caplan
75.1Kala Dandekar
72.9Lito Rodriguez
71.4Will Gorski
71.2Hernando Fuentes
56.8Angelica Turing

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
12%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Sense8?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 19
2 It's bad 23
3 It's okay 545
4 It's good 2478
5 It's my favorite 1140

This gives it an average score of 4.12 / 5. Making it 48th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 4.09
Female 4.12

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
nerd (not jock)0.10134398
nurturing (not poisonous)0.09644388
intimate (not formal)0.06094504
loyal (not traitorous)0.06054609
disarming (not creepy)0.05764388
high-tech (not low-tech)0.05212051
lenient (not strict)0.04844509
deep (not shallow)0.04814518
indulgent (not sober)0.04594380
altruistic (not selfish)0.0414387
frugal (not lavish)0.03924381
awkward (not charming)0.03824606
haunted (not blissful)0.0371931
outlaw (not sheriff)0.03414385
stinky (not fresh)0.03164382
beta (not alpha)0.02984384
emotional (not logical)0.02824603
mature (not juvenile)0.02711873
arcane (not mainstream)0.02624388
feisty (not gracious)0.02574386
angelic (not demonic)0.02574383
slovenly (not stylish)0.0254502
meek (not bossy)0.02324396
spiritual (not skeptical)0.02144592
creative (not conventional)0.02064621
blue-collar (not ivory-tower)0.02054377
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.02034393
genuine (not sarcastic)0.01792050
tame (not wild)0.01541952
reclusive (not social)0.01514381
masculine (not feminine)0.01494618
reasonable (not deranged)0.01144415
chaotic (not orderly)0.00514484
genius (not dunce)0.00474482
scientific (not artistic)0.00132167
rebellious (not obedient)0.00044505

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy