Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Ruby Sparks characters personality data for the Statistical Quiz

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of Ruby Sparks. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What Ruby Sparks character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.

Characters

The dataset has 2 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
82.2Ruby Tiffany Sparks
58.0Calvin Weir-Fields

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 16 and 60 years of age).
3% 0%
16
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Ruby Sparks?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 12
2 It's bad 16
3 It's okay 239
4 It's good 469
5 It's my favorite 80

This gives it an average score of 3.72 / 5. Making it 296th out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.75
Female 3.72

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
nerd (not jock)0.1693915
artistic (not scientific)0.1463917
nurturing (not poisonous)0.1289902
deep (not shallow)0.11918
disarming (not creepy)0.1089905
lenient (not strict)0.1057920
arcane (not mainstream)0.1025905
intimate (not formal)0.0897902
beta (not alpha)0.0784902
awkward (not charming)0.0736918
indulgent (not sober)0.0632900
creative (not conventional)0.0612920
angelic (not demonic)0.0575904
blissful (not haunted)0.0557902
stylish (not slovenly)0.0536903
meek (not bossy)0.0504915
loyal (not traitorous)0.0502907
reclusive (not social)0.0444905
emotional (not logical)0.0425908
outlaw (not sheriff)0.0406900
genius (not dunce)0.0401907
tame (not wild)0.0356918
deranged (not reasonable)0.0343917
juvenile (not mature)0.03914
low-tech (not high-tech)0.0292903
genuine (not sarcastic)0.0275904
stinky (not fresh)0.0182901
chaotic (not orderly)0.0179904
altruistic (not selfish)0.0171903
ivory-tower (not blue-collar)0.011898
feminine (not masculine)0.0078925
rebellious (not obedient)0.0076901
feisty (not gracious)0.0057902
stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous)0.0044905
spiritual (not skeptical)0.0038904
frugal (not lavish)0.0021901

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 24 February 2026
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy