Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Romeo and Juliet

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Romeo and Juliet.

Characters

The dataset has 6 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
79.6Romeo Montague
76.6Juliet Capulet
71.9Friar Laurence
66.1Mercutio
58.5The Nurse
53.1Benvolio

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
41%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Romeo and Juliet?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 83
2 It's bad 283
3 It's okay 2658
4 It's good 2170
5 It's my favorite 204

This gives it an average score of 3.39 / 5. Making it 329th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.39
Female 3.4

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
angelic (not demonic)0.08835624
spiritual (not skeptical)0.08155782
emotional (not logical)0.0755812
creative (not conventional)0.06355834
artistic (not scientific)0.06344670
genuine (not sarcastic)0.06214520
altruistic (not selfish)0.05345629
gracious (not feisty)0.04945621
nurturing (not poisonous)0.04895631
charming (not awkward)0.04875823
low-tech (not high-tech)0.04144525
deep (not shallow)0.045759
feminine (not masculine)0.03795866
obedient (not rebellious)0.03785697
social (not reclusive)0.03535632
indulgent (not sober)0.03355628
genius (not dunce)0.03355713
orderly (not chaotic)0.03025722
loyal (not traitorous)0.02995822
stylish (not slovenly)0.02815696
disarming (not creepy)0.02785666
intimate (not formal)0.02755705
sheriff (not outlaw)0.02745630
lavish (not frugal)0.01965616
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.01855627
mature (not juvenile)0.01844424
tame (not wild)0.0154517
ivory-tower (not blue-collar)0.01355626
strict (not lenient)0.01355795
reasonable (not deranged)0.0115717
blissful (not haunted)0.014457
arcane (not mainstream)0.00925655
meek (not bossy)0.00855682
alpha (not beta)0.00695622
jock (not nerd)0.0035682
fresh (not stinky)0.00015632

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy