Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Ratatouille characters personality data for the Statistical Quiz

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of Ratatouille. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What Ratatouille character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.

Characters

The dataset has 3 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
90.95Remy
61.35Alfredo Linguini
39.85Chef Skinner

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 16 and 60 years of age).
54% 0%
16
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Ratatouille?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 12
2 It's bad 35
3 It's okay 1895
4 It's good 6779
5 It's my favorite 1242

This gives it an average score of 3.92 / 5. Making it 173rd out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.98
Female 3.91

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
nurturing (not poisonous)0.081510520
nerd (not jock)0.074110616
genuine (not sarcastic)0.07328254
altruistic (not selfish)0.068910528
angelic (not demonic)0.065610521
meek (not bossy)0.061510613
disarming (not creepy)0.056410593
lenient (not strict)0.052210792
creative (not conventional)0.051110903
deep (not shallow)0.049310766
arcane (not mainstream)0.048410561
loyal (not traitorous)0.047810877
gracious (not feisty)0.046810518
artistic (not scientific)0.03958469
beta (not alpha)0.038310514
intimate (not formal)0.038110690
reasonable (not deranged)0.03810662
obedient (not rebellious)0.036810680
emotional (not logical)0.031110866
tame (not wild)0.02948173
orderly (not chaotic)0.025910663
masculine (not feminine)0.02510957
low-tech (not high-tech)0.0258231
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.023310544
blissful (not haunted)0.02278070
reclusive (not social)0.019510540
indulgent (not sober)0.012410525
frugal (not lavish)0.012210505
blue-collar (not ivory-tower)0.010110473
spiritual (not skeptical)0.008810802
mature (not juvenile)0.00848038
awkward (not charming)0.003210895
fresh (not stinky)0.00310521
outlaw (not sheriff)0.002910505
slovenly (not stylish)0.002810676
dunce (not genius)0.000510670

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 24 February 2026
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy