Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Poker Face characters personality data for the Statistical Quiz

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of Poker Face. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What Poker Face character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.

Characters

The dataset has 1 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
82.4Charlie Cale

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 16 and 60 years of age).
10% 0%
16
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Poker Face?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 24
2 It's bad 15
3 It's okay 162
4 It's good 318
5 It's my favorite 78

This gives it an average score of 3.69 / 5. Making it 313th out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.74
Female 3.67

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
nerd (not jock)0.2752656
nurturing (not poisonous)0.1997655
arcane (not mainstream)0.1911658
genius (not dunce)0.1683654
indulgent (not sober)0.1531653
beta (not alpha)0.1438654
stinky (not fresh)0.1386657
altruistic (not selfish)0.1376657
deep (not shallow)0.1316660
stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous)0.1316654
awkward (not charming)0.1253658
genuine (not sarcastic)0.1207657
disarming (not creepy)0.1101654
reclusive (not social)0.1099655
skeptical (not spiritual)0.1056655
tame (not wild)0.0942657
lenient (not strict)0.0885657
masculine (not feminine)0.0805660
scientific (not artistic)0.08655
logical (not emotional)0.0784656
intimate (not formal)0.0765656
frugal (not lavish)0.0712656
outlaw (not sheriff)0.0709653
reasonable (not deranged)0.069655
loyal (not traitorous)0.0571659
haunted (not blissful)0.0569656
slovenly (not stylish)0.0521654
gracious (not feisty)0.0391655
angelic (not demonic)0.0303652
orderly (not chaotic)0.0294658
ivory-tower (not blue-collar)0.0261653
low-tech (not high-tech)0.0183653
rebellious (not obedient)0.0101654
bossy (not meek)0.0071658
juvenile (not mature)0.0014655
creative (not conventional)0.0011661

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 24 February 2026
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy