The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of Mamma Mia!. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What Mamma Mia! character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.
| Notability | Name |
|---|---|
| 90.9 | Donna Sheridan |
| 86.9 | Sophie Sheridan |
| 68.15 | Tanya Chesham-Leigh |
| 65.05 | Sam Carmichael |
| 59.05 | Rosie Mulligan |
| 54.3 | Harry Bright |
| 53.95 | Bill Anderson |
| 36.1 | Sky Ramand |
| 20.7 | Pepper |
| 18.1 | Ali |
To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.
As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Mamma Mia!?". The distribution of their responses are below.
| # | Response | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | It's the worst | 31 |
| 2 | It's bad | 58 |
| 3 | It's okay | 1172 |
| 4 | It's good | 5008 |
| 5 | It's my favorite | 2213 |
This gives it an average score of 4.1 / 5. Making it 59th out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.
The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.
There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:
| Gender | Average rating |
|---|---|
| Male | 3.92 |
| Female | 4.11 |
The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.
| Item | Correlation with rating | n |
|---|---|---|
| feminine (not masculine) | 0.0834 | 9134 |
| obedient (not rebellious) | 0.0707 | 8226 |
| nurturing (not poisonous) | 0.0694 | 8216 |
| loyal (not traitorous) | 0.0629 | 9074 |
| angelic (not demonic) | 0.0575 | 8225 |
| disarming (not creepy) | 0.0518 | 9028 |
| emotional (not logical) | 0.05 | 9066 |
| spiritual (not skeptical) | 0.0449 | 8252 |
| intimate (not formal) | 0.0448 | 8221 |
| blissful (not haunted) | 0.0431 | 8217 |
| mainstream (not arcane) | 0.0401 | 9020 |
| social (not reclusive) | 0.0377 | 8230 |
| altruistic (not selfish) | 0.0375 | 8229 |
| fresh (not stinky) | 0.0366 | 8219 |
| stylish (not slovenly) | 0.0323 | 8219 |
| indulgent (not sober) | 0.0308 | 8224 |
| artistic (not scientific) | 0.0274 | 8321 |
| nerd (not jock) | 0.0267 | 8305 |
| sheriff (not outlaw) | 0.0265 | 8214 |
| genuine (not sarcastic) | 0.0263 | 8230 |
| tame (not wild) | 0.0246 | 8303 |
| deep (not shallow) | 0.0221 | 8295 |
| reasonable (not deranged) | 0.0207 | 9103 |
| beta (not alpha) | 0.0195 | 8205 |
| mature (not juvenile) | 0.0173 | 8292 |
| low-tech (not high-tech) | 0.0169 | 8216 |
| dunce (not genius) | 0.0163 | 8257 |
| lenient (not strict) | 0.0135 | 9132 |
| stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous) | 0.0116 | 8233 |
| gracious (not feisty) | 0.008 | 8220 |
| orderly (not chaotic) | 0.0056 | 8256 |
| ivory-tower (not blue-collar) | 0.005 | 8204 |
| creative (not conventional) | 0.0046 | 8328 |
| frugal (not lavish) | 0.0045 | 8197 |
| bossy (not meek) | 0.0025 | 8301 |
| charming (not awkward) | 0.0007 | 8328 |
How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are: