Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Mamma Mia!

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Mamma Mia!.

Characters

The dataset has 10 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
92.9Donna Sheridan
91.8Sophie Sheridan
77.6Tanya Chesham-Leigh
76.4Rosie Mulligan
73.1Harry Bright
72.8Sam Carmichael
69.4Bill Anderson
44.3Sky Ramand
24.4Ali
24.0Pepper

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
34%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Mamma Mia!?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 24
2 It's bad 46
3 It's okay 832
4 It's good 3438
5 It's my favorite 1528

This gives it an average score of 4.09 / 5. Making it 59th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.86
Female 4.11

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
feminine (not masculine)0.10976382
obedient (not rebellious)0.07065522
nurturing (not poisonous)0.06835515
loyal (not traitorous)0.06766333
angelic (not demonic)0.06625521
disarming (not creepy)0.06226323
emotional (not logical)0.06086328
blissful (not haunted)0.0565514
fresh (not stinky)0.0535512
mainstream (not arcane)0.04896317
spiritual (not skeptical)0.04815519
intimate (not formal)0.04775516
social (not reclusive)0.04585519
stylish (not slovenly)0.0455515
indulgent (not sober)0.04485518
altruistic (not selfish)0.04365521
artistic (not scientific)0.03535561
dunce (not genius)0.02575517
bossy (not meek)0.02125579
deep (not shallow)0.01975571
genuine (not sarcastic)0.01925524
low-tech (not high-tech)0.01715508
tame (not wild)0.01495572
mature (not juvenile)0.01275569
reasonable (not deranged)0.0116376
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.01095526
charming (not awkward)0.01035569
lavish (not frugal)0.00915498
lenient (not strict)0.00846375
beta (not alpha)0.00835505
nerd (not jock)0.00835576
sheriff (not outlaw)0.00765514
chaotic (not orderly)0.00625518
ivory-tower (not blue-collar)0.0065506
creative (not conventional)0.00395569
feisty (not gracious)0.00325515

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy