Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Elizabethtown characters personality data for the Statistical Quiz

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of Elizabethtown. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What Elizabethtown character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.

Characters

The dataset has 2 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
67.5Drew Baylor
66.4Claire Colburn

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 16 and 60 years of age).
5% 0%
16
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Elizabethtown?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 17
2 It's bad 26
3 It's okay 356
4 It's good 481
5 It's my favorite 87

This gives it an average score of 3.62 / 5. Making it 335th out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.57
Female 3.62

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
nurturing (not poisonous)0.16821017
deep (not shallow)0.16291024
nerd (not jock)0.14941029
genuine (not sarcastic)0.11991018
low-tech (not high-tech)0.11541015
intimate (not formal)0.11521018
disarming (not creepy)0.11241014
beta (not alpha)0.10131010
arcane (not mainstream)0.0761018
awkward (not charming)0.07551027
lenient (not strict)0.07311023
indulgent (not sober)0.07071012
loyal (not traitorous)0.0691018
frugal (not lavish)0.06271014
altruistic (not selfish)0.05981018
reasonable (not deranged)0.05831031
angelic (not demonic)0.05791015
genius (not dunce)0.05361017
blue-collar (not ivory-tower)0.04421016
tame (not wild)0.04351027
meek (not bossy)0.03551027
feisty (not gracious)0.03361012
reclusive (not social)0.0331019
haunted (not blissful)0.0321014
emotional (not logical)0.0271019
masculine (not feminine)0.02651035
creative (not conventional)0.02571030
slovenly (not stylish)0.02351016
outlaw (not sheriff)0.01891014
spiritual (not skeptical)0.0181011
obedient (not rebellious)0.01661016
juvenile (not mature)0.01161030
fresh (not stinky)0.01141010
stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous)0.01121016
artistic (not scientific)0.00751028
chaotic (not orderly)0.00421014

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 24 February 2026
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy