The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Downton Abbey.
Notability | Name |
---|---|
87.3 | Violet Crawley, Dowager Countess of Grantham |
86.2 | Lady Mary Crawley |
82.1 | Lady Sybil Crawley |
79.7 | Charlie Carson |
76.9 | Elsie Carson |
74.3 | John Bates |
73.2 | Robert Crawley, 7th Earl of Grantham |
71.4 | Anna Bates |
71.1 | Cora Crawley, Countess of Grantham |
64.3 | Daisy Mason |
62.7 | Thomas Barrow |
61.5 | Beryl Patmore |
49.2 | Lady Edith Crawley |
40.4 | Sarah O'Brien |
27.9 | William Mason |
To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.
As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Downton Abbey?". The distribution of their responses are below.
# | Response | Count |
---|---|---|
1 | It's the worst | 19 |
2 | It's bad | 18 |
3 | It's okay | 508 |
4 | It's good | 2143 |
5 | It's my favorite | 647 |
This gives it an average score of 4.01 / 5. Making it 100th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.
The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.
There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:
Gender | Average rating |
---|---|
Male | 3.97 |
Female | 4.02 |
The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.
Item | Correlation with rating | n |
---|---|---|
nurturing (not poisonous) | 0.1207 | 3372 |
sheriff (not outlaw) | 0.1096 | 3372 |
angelic (not demonic) | 0.1055 | 3371 |
orderly (not chaotic) | 0.0931 | 3424 |
low-tech (not high-tech) | 0.0883 | 2338 |
obedient (not rebellious) | 0.0827 | 3457 |
tame (not wild) | 0.0805 | 2266 |
disarming (not creepy) | 0.0767 | 3387 |
genuine (not sarcastic) | 0.0677 | 2339 |
reasonable (not deranged) | 0.0676 | 3400 |
nerd (not jock) | 0.0639 | 3382 |
gracious (not feisty) | 0.0536 | 3372 |
feminine (not masculine) | 0.053 | 3533 |
genius (not dunce) | 0.0525 | 3422 |
mature (not juvenile) | 0.0493 | 2223 |
altruistic (not selfish) | 0.049 | 3370 |
loyal (not traitorous) | 0.0465 | 3521 |
social (not reclusive) | 0.0446 | 3374 |
charming (not awkward) | 0.0411 | 3516 |
emotional (not logical) | 0.0372 | 3516 |
spiritual (not skeptical) | 0.0358 | 3501 |
stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous) | 0.0346 | 3371 |
frugal (not lavish) | 0.0322 | 3375 |
strict (not lenient) | 0.0306 | 3447 |
blissful (not haunted) | 0.0271 | 2248 |
ivory-tower (not blue-collar) | 0.0196 | 3370 |
intimate (not formal) | 0.0166 | 3459 |
artistic (not scientific) | 0.0149 | 2403 |
mainstream (not arcane) | 0.0145 | 3379 |
beta (not alpha) | 0.0138 | 3373 |
conventional (not creative) | 0.0127 | 3525 |
bossy (not meek) | 0.0112 | 3382 |
deep (not shallow) | 0.0105 | 3471 |
stinky (not fresh) | 0.0035 | 3373 |
sober (not indulgent) | 0.0033 | 3371 |
stylish (not slovenly) | 0.0009 | 3454 |
How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are: