The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of The Big Sick. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What The Big Sick character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.
| Notability | Name |
|---|---|
| 72.65 | Kumail Nanjiani |
| 67.45 | Emily Gardner |
To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.
As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate The Big Sick?". The distribution of their responses are below.
| # | Response | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | It's the worst | 7 |
| 2 | It's bad | 13 |
| 3 | It's okay | 172 |
| 4 | It's good | 703 |
| 5 | It's my favorite | 54 |
This gives it an average score of 3.83 / 5. Making it 242nd out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.
The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.
There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:
| Gender | Average rating |
|---|---|
| Male | 3.88 |
| Female | 3.81 |
The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.
| Item | Correlation with rating | n |
|---|---|---|
| nurturing (not poisonous) | 0.2006 | 1046 |
| nerd (not jock) | 0.1822 | 1057 |
| deep (not shallow) | 0.1471 | 1056 |
| disarming (not creepy) | 0.1128 | 1048 |
| genius (not dunce) | 0.104 | 1051 |
| altruistic (not selfish) | 0.0875 | 1047 |
| reasonable (not deranged) | 0.0851 | 1056 |
| gracious (not feisty) | 0.0774 | 1049 |
| intimate (not formal) | 0.0772 | 1049 |
| beta (not alpha) | 0.0696 | 1045 |
| mature (not juvenile) | 0.0687 | 1056 |
| angelic (not demonic) | 0.0653 | 1047 |
| genuine (not sarcastic) | 0.0615 | 1050 |
| indulgent (not sober) | 0.0614 | 1045 |
| stinky (not fresh) | 0.0606 | 1049 |
| loyal (not traitorous) | 0.0598 | 1051 |
| obedient (not rebellious) | 0.0546 | 1048 |
| arcane (not mainstream) | 0.0503 | 1048 |
| tame (not wild) | 0.0502 | 1053 |
| frugal (not lavish) | 0.0476 | 1049 |
| masculine (not feminine) | 0.0473 | 1057 |
| skeptical (not spiritual) | 0.043 | 1047 |
| awkward (not charming) | 0.0415 | 1056 |
| low-tech (not high-tech) | 0.0401 | 1046 |
| creative (not conventional) | 0.0395 | 1056 |
| lenient (not strict) | 0.0386 | 1054 |
| meek (not bossy) | 0.0222 | 1057 |
| stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous) | 0.0168 | 1048 |
| ivory-tower (not blue-collar) | 0.0166 | 1049 |
| orderly (not chaotic) | 0.0148 | 1050 |
| sheriff (not outlaw) | 0.0113 | 1045 |
| social (not reclusive) | 0.0082 | 1050 |
| logical (not emotional) | 0.0043 | 1052 |
| artistic (not scientific) | 0.0042 | 1054 |
| blissful (not haunted) | 0.0014 | 1049 |
| slovenly (not stylish) | 0.0002 | 1046 |
How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are: