Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Parks and Recreation

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Parks and Recreation.

Characters

The dataset has 10 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
88.9Leslie Knope
86.6Ron Swanson
78.8April Ludgate
72.7Donna Meagle
72.0Ben Wyatt
67.9Ann Perkins
65.5Chris Traeger
59.4Tom Haverford
33.2Jerry Gergich
19.3Mark Brendanawicz

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
52%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Parks and Recreation?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 13
2 It's bad 16
3 It's okay 694
4 It's good 5209
5 It's my favorite 2394

This gives it an average score of 4.2 / 5. Making it 16th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 4.13
Female 4.21

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
nurturing (not poisonous)0.06648692
nerd (not jock)0.06568728
disarming (not creepy)0.06068725
loyal (not traitorous)0.06058974
sheriff (not outlaw)0.06058680
feminine (not masculine)0.05539007
angelic (not demonic)0.05128682
altruistic (not selfish)0.04198694
reasonable (not deranged)0.04128766
genius (not dunce)0.048826
obedient (not rebellious)0.03998798
blissful (not haunted)0.03773972
orderly (not chaotic)0.0378840
mainstream (not arcane)0.0368708
social (not reclusive)0.03448697
intimate (not formal)0.03168806
bossy (not meek)0.02758737
deep (not shallow)0.0258838
fresh (not stinky)0.02168702
high-tech (not low-tech)0.02094079
gracious (not feisty)0.01468689
sarcastic (not genuine)0.01454093
stylish (not slovenly)0.01448798
tame (not wild)0.01394020
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.01328692
juvenile (not mature)0.0083955
strict (not lenient)0.00748909
charming (not awkward)0.00728975
emotional (not logical)0.00728961
indulgent (not sober)0.0068681
artistic (not scientific)0.00574263
spiritual (not skeptical)0.00518925
frugal (not lavish)0.00478678
blue-collar (not ivory-tower)0.00388656
creative (not conventional)0.00238987
beta (not alpha)0.00158693

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy