Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

No Hard Feelings characters personality data for the Statistical Quiz

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of No Hard Feelings. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What No Hard Feelings character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.

Characters

The dataset has 2 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
78.3Maddie Barker
51.75Percy Becker

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 16 and 60 years of age).
10% 0%
16
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate No Hard Feelings?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 28
2 It's bad 144
3 It's okay 1377
4 It's good 2748
5 It's my favorite 134

This gives it an average score of 3.64 / 5. Making it 331st out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.5
Female 3.65

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
feminine (not masculine)0.06964592
nurturing (not poisonous)0.05444546
disarming (not creepy)0.05394546
angelic (not demonic)0.05284544
mainstream (not arcane)0.04914536
indulgent (not sober)0.0494542
emotional (not logical)0.04324555
blissful (not haunted)0.04064543
obedient (not rebellious)0.03234551
beta (not alpha)0.03174543
spiritual (not skeptical)0.03174558
lenient (not strict)0.03074595
ivory-tower (not blue-collar)0.02944542
intimate (not formal)0.02294550
feisty (not gracious)0.0224540
conventional (not creative)0.02084594
deep (not shallow)0.01834585
meek (not bossy)0.01414586
altruistic (not selfish)0.01344546
artistic (not scientific)0.01314593
orderly (not chaotic)0.01214551
slovenly (not stylish)0.01054549
reasonable (not deranged)0.00944585
tame (not wild)0.00844587
nerd (not jock)0.00834588
social (not reclusive)0.00784549
dunce (not genius)0.00694556
awkward (not charming)0.00694594
loyal (not traitorous)0.00674555
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.00614553
fresh (not stinky)0.00474543
high-tech (not low-tech)0.00374551
sarcastic (not genuine)0.0024551
outlaw (not sheriff)0.00114544
mature (not juvenile)0.0014581
lavish (not frugal)0.00054537

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 24 February 2026
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy