Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

The Mentalist characters personality data for the Statistical Quiz

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of The Mentalist. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What The Mentalist character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.

Characters

The dataset has 6 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
94.3Patrick Jane
83.35Teresa Lisbon
66.75Red John
56.0Kimball Cho
46.1Grace Van Pelt
39.05Wayne Rigsby

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 16 and 60 years of age).
17% 0%
16
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate The Mentalist?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 7
2 It's bad 16
3 It's okay 492
4 It's good 1828
5 It's my favorite 540

This gives it an average score of 4.0 / 5. Making it 114th out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.95
Female 4.01

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
genius (not dunce)0.07672981
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.06342938
deep (not shallow)0.05992983
spiritual (not skeptical)0.05473030
nurturing (not poisonous)0.05462937
loyal (not traitorous)0.05043050
fresh (not stinky)0.04772936
sober (not indulgent)0.04532942
sarcastic (not genuine)0.04242563
arcane (not mainstream)0.0312946
wild (not tame)0.03062562
mature (not juvenile)0.03042491
bossy (not meek)0.02872961
haunted (not blissful)0.02682533
logical (not emotional)0.02643011
ivory-tower (not blue-collar)0.02622933
altruistic (not selfish)0.02552941
creative (not conventional)0.02483056
social (not reclusive)0.02462941
reasonable (not deranged)0.02262966
sheriff (not outlaw)0.01972938
nerd (not jock)0.01842965
disarming (not creepy)0.01722952
orderly (not chaotic)0.01663009
angelic (not demonic)0.01542932
lavish (not frugal)0.0132930
feminine (not masculine)0.01223062
artistic (not scientific)0.0092656
intimate (not formal)0.00792965
alpha (not beta)0.0062928
feisty (not gracious)0.00542932
strict (not lenient)0.00383046
high-tech (not low-tech)0.00062553
obedient (not rebellious)0.00042966
awkward (not charming)0.00033055
slovenly (not stylish)0.00012964

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 24 February 2026
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy