The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Mad Men.
| Notability | Name |
|---|---|
| 90.1 | Peggy Olson |
| 85.3 | Don Draper |
| 84.2 | Joan Holloway |
| 82.1 | Roger Sterling |
| 66.9 | Bert Cooper |
| 60.8 | Lane Pryce |
| 55.2 | Betty Draper |
| 48.9 | Rachel Menken |
| 48.1 | Salvatore Romano |
| 45.1 | Pete Campbell |
| 45.0 | Henry Francis |
| 40.4 | Ken Cosgrove |
| 38.4 | Harry Crane |
| 34.4 | Stan Rizzo |
| 31.3 | Paul Kinsey |
To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.
As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Mad Men?". The distribution of their responses are below.
| # | Response | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | It's the worst | 20 |
| 2 | It's bad | 15 |
| 3 | It's okay | 403 |
| 4 | It's good | 1557 |
| 5 | It's my favorite | 472 |
This gives it an average score of 3.99 / 5. Making it 119th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.
The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.
There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:
| Gender | Average rating |
|---|---|
| Male | 4.09 |
| Female | 3.96 |
The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.
| Item | Correlation with rating | n |
|---|---|---|
| nerd (not jock) | 0.1295 | 2478 |
| angelic (not demonic) | 0.0897 | 2463 |
| indulgent (not sober) | 0.0869 | 2461 |
| reasonable (not deranged) | 0.083 | 2484 |
| deep (not shallow) | 0.0767 | 2546 |
| genuine (not sarcastic) | 0.0655 | 1665 |
| nurturing (not poisonous) | 0.0614 | 2459 |
| orderly (not chaotic) | 0.0611 | 2486 |
| disarming (not creepy) | 0.0538 | 2474 |
| tame (not wild) | 0.0534 | 1619 |
| skeptical (not spiritual) | 0.0501 | 2545 |
| creative (not conventional) | 0.0471 | 2565 |
| loyal (not traitorous) | 0.044 | 2559 |
| arcane (not mainstream) | 0.0427 | 2471 |
| masculine (not feminine) | 0.0416 | 2576 |
| stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous) | 0.0398 | 2463 |
| genius (not dunce) | 0.0396 | 2488 |
| gracious (not feisty) | 0.0353 | 2458 |
| altruistic (not selfish) | 0.0294 | 2464 |
| stinky (not fresh) | 0.0279 | 2466 |
| stylish (not slovenly) | 0.026 | 2529 |
| frugal (not lavish) | 0.0259 | 2460 |
| haunted (not blissful) | 0.0215 | 1593 |
| lenient (not strict) | 0.0206 | 2513 |
| beta (not alpha) | 0.0201 | 2463 |
| social (not reclusive) | 0.0188 | 2463 |
| obedient (not rebellious) | 0.018 | 2521 |
| charming (not awkward) | 0.0149 | 2568 |
| bossy (not meek) | 0.0137 | 2480 |
| sheriff (not outlaw) | 0.0087 | 2465 |
| mature (not juvenile) | 0.008 | 1588 |
| formal (not intimate) | 0.0079 | 2525 |
| logical (not emotional) | 0.0066 | 2560 |
| artistic (not scientific) | 0.0055 | 1704 |
| high-tech (not low-tech) | 0.0046 | 1666 |
| ivory-tower (not blue-collar) | 0.0045 | 2458 |
How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are: