The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of Mean Girls. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What Mean Girls character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.
| Notability | Name |
|---|---|
| 81.5 | Regina George |
| 71.4 | Cady Heron |
| 52.75 | Janis Ian |
| 52.4 | Damian Leigh |
| 42.15 | Karen Smith |
| 41.1 | Ms. Sharon Norbury |
| 40.8 | Aaron Samuels |
| 38.85 | Gretchen Wieners |
| 32.7 | June George |
| 18.95 | Betsy Heron |
To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.
As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Mean Girls?". The distribution of their responses are below.
| # | Response | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | It's the worst | 19 |
| 2 | It's bad | 69 |
| 3 | It's okay | 2802 |
| 4 | It's good | 9582 |
| 5 | It's my favorite | 2099 |
This gives it an average score of 3.94 / 5. Making it 161st out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.
The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.
There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:
| Gender | Average rating |
|---|---|
| Male | 3.99 |
| Female | 3.94 |
The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.
| Item | Correlation with rating | n |
|---|---|---|
| stylish (not slovenly) | 0.0833 | 15039 |
| social (not reclusive) | 0.0814 | 14887 |
| feminine (not masculine) | 0.0796 | 15420 |
| charming (not awkward) | 0.0769 | 15353 |
| mainstream (not arcane) | 0.0678 | 14882 |
| jock (not nerd) | 0.067 | 15020 |
| lavish (not frugal) | 0.0641 | 14816 |
| selfish (not altruistic) | 0.0582 | 14882 |
| spiritual (not skeptical) | 0.0563 | 15213 |
| shallow (not deep) | 0.0528 | 15187 |
| bossy (not meek) | 0.0516 | 15004 |
| fresh (not stinky) | 0.0503 | 14870 |
| artistic (not scientific) | 0.0475 | 12267 |
| high-tech (not low-tech) | 0.0398 | 11889 |
| wild (not tame) | 0.0383 | 11931 |
| emotional (not logical) | 0.037 | 15274 |
| juvenile (not mature) | 0.0361 | 11717 |
| blissful (not haunted) | 0.0353 | 11752 |
| alpha (not beta) | 0.0332 | 14854 |
| rebellious (not obedient) | 0.0316 | 15029 |
| adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud) | 0.0281 | 14889 |
| indulgent (not sober) | 0.0239 | 14855 |
| intimate (not formal) | 0.0195 | 15051 |
| poisonous (not nurturing) | 0.0195 | 14881 |
| sarcastic (not genuine) | 0.0174 | 11949 |
| feisty (not gracious) | 0.0148 | 14867 |
| traitorous (not loyal) | 0.0108 | 15313 |
| ivory-tower (not blue-collar) | 0.0094 | 14771 |
| lenient (not strict) | 0.0085 | 15274 |
| chaotic (not orderly) | 0.0078 | 15063 |
| deranged (not reasonable) | 0.0074 | 15075 |
| creative (not conventional) | 0.0034 | 15371 |
| dunce (not genius) | 0.0017 | 15056 |
| disarming (not creepy) | 0.0013 | 14912 |
| angelic (not demonic) | 0.0009 | 14877 |
| sheriff (not outlaw) | 0.0006 | 14832 |
How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are: