Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Mulholland Drive

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Mulholland Drive.

Characters

The dataset has 2 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
77.8Rita
60.6Betty Elms

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
11%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Mulholland Drive?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 9
2 It's bad 13
3 It's okay 139
4 It's good 574
5 It's my favorite 247

This gives it an average score of 4.06 / 5. Making it 76th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 4.13
Female 4.01

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
arcane (not mainstream)0.11161111
haunted (not blissful)0.09471112
nerd (not jock)0.0811122
outlaw (not sheriff)0.0761108
indulgent (not sober)0.07371110
beta (not alpha)0.06541109
traitorous (not loyal)0.06391112
deranged (not reasonable)0.0611122
awkward (not charming)0.05851118
stylish (not slovenly)0.05831109
artistic (not scientific)0.05051120
lenient (not strict)0.04971123
rebellious (not obedient)0.04961112
poisonous (not nurturing)0.04941113
stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous)0.04581113
meek (not bossy)0.04151119
selfish (not altruistic)0.04111110
reclusive (not social)0.04041110
deep (not shallow)0.04011122
gracious (not feisty)0.03571111
chaotic (not orderly)0.03541112
sarcastic (not genuine)0.02991112
stinky (not fresh)0.02771111
demonic (not angelic)0.02541111
intimate (not formal)0.02441111
skeptical (not spiritual)0.02411113
high-tech (not low-tech)0.02171113
frugal (not lavish)0.0211113
masculine (not feminine)0.02091123
emotional (not logical)0.01221111
tame (not wild)0.00841121
creative (not conventional)0.00271120
creepy (not disarming)0.00271110
mature (not juvenile)0.00161124
blue-collar (not ivory-tower)0.00041110
dunce (not genius)0.00011109

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy