Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Lucifer

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Lucifer.

Characters

The dataset has 6 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
91.0Lucifer Morningstar
84.8Chloe Decker
79.0Linda Martin
74.8Mazikeen
69.3Amenadiel
39.2Dan Espinoza

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
28%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Lucifer?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 21
2 It's bad 47
3 It's okay 1135
4 It's good 4518
5 It's my favorite 1813

This gives it an average score of 4.07 / 5. Making it 67th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 4.01
Female 4.08

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
high-tech (not low-tech)0.05986329
mainstream (not arcane)0.05787694
fresh (not stinky)0.05677683
demonic (not angelic)0.05147664
alpha (not beta)0.05117695
lavish (not frugal)0.04567648
bossy (not meek)0.04297755
loyal (not traitorous)0.04017925
jock (not nerd)0.03487771
feisty (not gracious)0.03137684
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.02897690
charming (not awkward)0.02867964
spiritual (not skeptical)0.02847884
social (not reclusive)0.02757686
creative (not conventional)0.02567971
feminine (not masculine)0.02087982
sarcastic (not genuine)0.02046334
sheriff (not outlaw)0.02027677
emotional (not logical)0.01627923
creepy (not disarming)0.01587720
sober (not indulgent)0.0157679
nurturing (not poisonous)0.01457683
wild (not tame)0.01296335
blissful (not haunted)0.01136249
juvenile (not mature)0.01126188
genius (not dunce)0.00967800
rebellious (not obedient)0.00857765
artistic (not scientific)0.00836532
stylish (not slovenly)0.00767767
strict (not lenient)0.00627913
deranged (not reasonable)0.00587785
shallow (not deep)0.00447860
intimate (not formal)0.00347780
blue-collar (not ivory-tower)0.00147654
altruistic (not selfish)0.00127695
chaotic (not orderly)0.00077796

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy