Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Green Book characters personality data for the Statistical Quiz

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of Green Book. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What Green Book character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.

Characters

The dataset has 2 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
78.85Don Shirley
62.05Tony Lip

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 16 and 60 years of age).
10% 0%
16
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Green Book?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 16
2 It's bad 21
3 It's okay 224
4 It's good 739
5 It's my favorite 93

This gives it an average score of 3.8 / 5. Making it 259th out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.82
Female 3.79

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
deep (not shallow)0.10921165
angelic (not demonic)0.09551148
sheriff (not outlaw)0.09471148
frugal (not lavish)0.09211147
loyal (not traitorous)0.09011164
reasonable (not deranged)0.08671168
alpha (not beta)0.08181148
disarming (not creepy)0.08041149
logical (not emotional)0.07941167
charming (not awkward)0.06611172
nurturing (not poisonous)0.06341147
genius (not dunce)0.06031160
masculine (not feminine)0.05121176
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.0491144
strict (not lenient)0.0491179
jock (not nerd)0.04841161
altruistic (not selfish)0.04741146
scientific (not artistic)0.0461176
mature (not juvenile)0.04551159
intimate (not formal)0.03961145
social (not reclusive)0.0381145
bossy (not meek)0.03351156
fresh (not stinky)0.03321151
obedient (not rebellious)0.03111145
orderly (not chaotic)0.03071163
genuine (not sarcastic)0.031147
stylish (not slovenly)0.02761146
wild (not tame)0.02431163
gracious (not feisty)0.02291146
ivory-tower (not blue-collar)0.02171144
high-tech (not low-tech)0.02051145
creative (not conventional)0.01721178
spiritual (not skeptical)0.00731160
blissful (not haunted)0.00651148
sober (not indulgent)0.00421146
mainstream (not arcane)0.00081152

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 24 February 2026
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy