The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of Friday Night Lights. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What Friday Night Lights character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.
| Notability | Name |
|---|---|
| 86.8 | Tim Riggins |
| 85.95 | Eric Taylor |
| 80.5 | Matt Saracen |
| 78.05 | Tami Taylor |
| 69.5 | Lyla Garrity |
| 58.5 | Tyra Collette |
| 56.65 | Smash Williams |
| 43.05 | Jason Street |
| 36.05 | Landry Clarke |
| 35.9 | Julie Taylor |
To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.
As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Friday Night Lights?". The distribution of their responses are below.
| # | Response | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | It's the worst | 77 |
| 2 | It's bad | 45 |
| 3 | It's okay | 621 |
| 4 | It's good | 1821 |
| 5 | It's my favorite | 392 |
This gives it an average score of 3.81 / 5. Making it 249th out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.
The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.
There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:
| Gender | Average rating |
|---|---|
| Male | 3.79 |
| Female | 3.82 |
The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.
| Item | Correlation with rating | n |
|---|---|---|
| nurturing (not poisonous) | 0.2125 | 2965 |
| disarming (not creepy) | 0.1881 | 2966 |
| mature (not juvenile) | 0.1589 | 2063 |
| angelic (not demonic) | 0.1519 | 2964 |
| reasonable (not deranged) | 0.1451 | 2971 |
| genius (not dunce) | 0.1258 | 2983 |
| tame (not wild) | 0.1197 | 2068 |
| deep (not shallow) | 0.115 | 3002 |
| orderly (not chaotic) | 0.1087 | 2983 |
| obedient (not rebellious) | 0.1074 | 2983 |
| genuine (not sarcastic) | 0.0891 | 2083 |
| blissful (not haunted) | 0.0868 | 2054 |
| sheriff (not outlaw) | 0.0868 | 2961 |
| loyal (not traitorous) | 0.0784 | 3016 |
| indulgent (not sober) | 0.0735 | 2963 |
| intimate (not formal) | 0.0709 | 2985 |
| conventional (not creative) | 0.0692 | 3020 |
| scientific (not artistic) | 0.0684 | 2117 |
| altruistic (not selfish) | 0.0654 | 2965 |
| nerd (not jock) | 0.0564 | 2975 |
| logical (not emotional) | 0.0433 | 3006 |
| mainstream (not arcane) | 0.0393 | 2965 |
| skeptical (not spiritual) | 0.0344 | 3013 |
| low-tech (not high-tech) | 0.0337 | 2083 |
| charming (not awkward) | 0.0281 | 3019 |
| stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous) | 0.0251 | 2963 |
| feminine (not masculine) | 0.024 | 3018 |
| slovenly (not stylish) | 0.0232 | 2986 |
| bossy (not meek) | 0.0209 | 2972 |
| stinky (not fresh) | 0.0193 | 2961 |
| social (not reclusive) | 0.0178 | 2964 |
| ivory-tower (not blue-collar) | 0.0149 | 2955 |
| frugal (not lavish) | 0.0129 | 2959 |
| beta (not alpha) | 0.0115 | 2959 |
| lenient (not strict) | 0.0076 | 2997 |
| gracious (not feisty) | 0.0009 | 2962 |
How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are: