The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Friday Night Lights.
| Notability | Name |
|---|---|
| 89.9 | Eric Taylor |
| 86.1 | Tim Riggins |
| 83.2 | Tami Taylor |
| 82.0 | Matt Saracen |
| 72.2 | Smash Williams |
| 70.0 | Tyra Collette |
| 61.7 | Lyla Garrity |
| 56.7 | Landry Clarke |
| 53.4 | Julie Taylor |
| 49.2 | Jason Street |
To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.
As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Friday Night Lights?". The distribution of their responses are below.
| # | Response | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | It's the worst | 51 |
| 2 | It's bad | 29 |
| 3 | It's okay | 439 |
| 4 | It's good | 1351 |
| 5 | It's my favorite | 297 |
This gives it an average score of 3.84 / 5. Making it 229th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.
The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.
There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:
| Gender | Average rating |
|---|---|
| Male | 3.83 |
| Female | 3.84 |
The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.
| Item | Correlation with rating | n |
|---|---|---|
| nurturing (not poisonous) | 0.2126 | 2155 |
| disarming (not creepy) | 0.2001 | 2156 |
| angelic (not demonic) | 0.1757 | 2151 |
| mature (not juvenile) | 0.1374 | 1248 |
| reasonable (not deranged) | 0.1265 | 2159 |
| loyal (not traitorous) | 0.1194 | 2202 |
| obedient (not rebellious) | 0.1129 | 2175 |
| blissful (not haunted) | 0.1094 | 1247 |
| tame (not wild) | 0.1035 | 1256 |
| orderly (not chaotic) | 0.1022 | 2169 |
| genius (not dunce) | 0.0996 | 2170 |
| deep (not shallow) | 0.0977 | 2188 |
| indulgent (not sober) | 0.0776 | 2154 |
| altruistic (not selfish) | 0.0768 | 2154 |
| sheriff (not outlaw) | 0.0675 | 2151 |
| intimate (not formal) | 0.065 | 2176 |
| scientific (not artistic) | 0.0608 | 1298 |
| genuine (not sarcastic) | 0.06 | 1271 |
| conventional (not creative) | 0.0585 | 2204 |
| mainstream (not arcane) | 0.0467 | 2157 |
| charming (not awkward) | 0.0432 | 2202 |
| logical (not emotional) | 0.0402 | 2193 |
| nerd (not jock) | 0.0396 | 2162 |
| frugal (not lavish) | 0.0312 | 2147 |
| skeptical (not spiritual) | 0.0303 | 2199 |
| slovenly (not stylish) | 0.0249 | 2178 |
| bossy (not meek) | 0.0247 | 2157 |
| stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous) | 0.0238 | 2150 |
| feminine (not masculine) | 0.0168 | 2204 |
| blue-collar (not ivory-tower) | 0.0135 | 2147 |
| beta (not alpha) | 0.0123 | 2152 |
| stinky (not fresh) | 0.0117 | 2151 |
| social (not reclusive) | 0.0109 | 2152 |
| gracious (not feisty) | 0.0067 | 2152 |
| high-tech (not low-tech) | 0.0058 | 1272 |
| lenient (not strict) | 0.0031 | 2179 |
How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are: