Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Fleabag characters personality data for the Statistical Quiz

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of Fleabag. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What Fleabag character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.

Characters

The dataset has 3 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
90.35Fleabag
49.65Claire
33.95Godmother

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 16 and 60 years of age).
20% 0%
16
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Fleabag?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 7
2 It's bad 8
3 It's okay 188
4 It's good 2144
5 It's my favorite 1640

This gives it an average score of 4.35 / 5. Making it 3rd out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 4.28
Female 4.36

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
intimate (not formal)0.08234167
creative (not conventional)0.06964256
indulgent (not sober)0.06054138
outlaw (not sheriff)0.05994133
artistic (not scientific)0.05873064
wild (not tame)0.05272979
emotional (not logical)0.05114233
chaotic (not orderly)0.05064197
lenient (not strict)0.04534247
stylish (not slovenly)0.04494163
bossy (not meek)0.044166
disarming (not creepy)0.0394149
arcane (not mainstream)0.03694148
charming (not awkward)0.03444257
feisty (not gracious)0.03414136
nerd (not jock)0.03214168
social (not reclusive)0.03154137
feminine (not masculine)0.03134258
lavish (not frugal)0.03084134
low-tech (not high-tech)0.032970
genius (not dunce)0.02914198
deranged (not reasonable)0.02824179
rebellious (not obedient)0.02784158
sarcastic (not genuine)0.02742969
demonic (not angelic)0.02464133
traitorous (not loyal)0.02194238
nurturing (not poisonous)0.02124140
mature (not juvenile)0.0212910
haunted (not blissful)0.02012942
deep (not shallow)0.01624202
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.01184140
selfish (not altruistic)0.00964137
stinky (not fresh)0.00944139
blue-collar (not ivory-tower)0.00814124
skeptical (not spiritual)0.00424221
alpha (not beta)0.00044129

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 24 February 2026
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy