Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Fleabag

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Fleabag.

Characters

The dataset has 3 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
85.2Fleabag
71.4Claire
43.7Godmother

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
21%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Fleabag?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 4
2 It's bad 5
3 It's okay 144
4 It's good 1704
5 It's my favorite 1323

This gives it an average score of 4.36 / 5. Making it 4th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 4.28
Female 4.37

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
intimate (not formal)0.07753292
artistic (not scientific)0.06172171
indulgent (not sober)0.05863264
emotional (not logical)0.05693348
creative (not conventional)0.0563363
sarcastic (not genuine)0.05562093
lenient (not strict)0.04813354
wild (not tame)0.04712097
stylish (not slovenly)0.04623286
charming (not awkward)0.04523362
lavish (not frugal)0.04463257
feminine (not masculine)0.04433367
chaotic (not orderly)0.04433312
disarming (not creepy)0.04213272
outlaw (not sheriff)0.03813256
nerd (not jock)0.03483284
mature (not juvenile)0.03222026
arcane (not mainstream)0.033270
feisty (not gracious)0.02743260
low-tech (not high-tech)0.0272096
ivory-tower (not blue-collar)0.02613251
traitorous (not loyal)0.02293352
bossy (not meek)0.02253279
genius (not dunce)0.02253314
rebellious (not obedient)0.02013281
social (not reclusive)0.023262
selfish (not altruistic)0.01723261
deranged (not reasonable)0.01583296
deep (not shallow)0.01463313
blissful (not haunted)0.01442065
nurturing (not poisonous)0.00943263
beta (not alpha)0.00913252
demonic (not angelic)0.00633257
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.00213264
fresh (not stinky)0.0023261
skeptical (not spiritual)0.00123337

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy