Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Damages characters personality data for the Statistical Quiz

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of Damages. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What Damages character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.

Characters

The dataset has 3 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
86.7Patty Hewes
73.3Ellen Parsons
46.4Tom Shayes

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 16 and 60 years of age).
4% 0%
16
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Damages?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 84
2 It's bad 61
3 It's okay 467
4 It's good 488
5 It's my favorite 80

This gives it an average score of 3.36 / 5. Making it 358th out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.49
Female 3.3

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
nerd (not jock)0.1511171
indulgent (not sober)0.12541159
nurturing (not poisonous)0.12461171
masculine (not feminine)0.1041195
genius (not dunce)0.10021188
logical (not emotional)0.10011190
intimate (not formal)0.09591172
sheriff (not outlaw)0.08931163
reclusive (not social)0.08581160
slovenly (not stylish)0.0841169
loyal (not traitorous)0.08161190
deep (not shallow)0.08051176
ivory-tower (not blue-collar)0.07831159
disarming (not creepy)0.07671165
altruistic (not selfish)0.07391158
angelic (not demonic)0.07131165
stick-in-the-mud (not adventurous)0.06991171
tame (not wild)0.0695885
arcane (not mainstream)0.0571166
reasonable (not deranged)0.05661175
scientific (not artistic)0.0533905
conventional (not creative)0.05251191
orderly (not chaotic)0.04491175
mature (not juvenile)0.0425856
stinky (not fresh)0.04081168
genuine (not sarcastic)0.0348877
feisty (not gracious)0.03011162
skeptical (not spiritual)0.02561185
awkward (not charming)0.02261193
frugal (not lavish)0.01991160
high-tech (not low-tech)0.0103878
blissful (not haunted)0.0096877
lenient (not strict)0.00751186
bossy (not meek)0.00591177
rebellious (not obedient)0.00461166
alpha (not beta)0.00291170

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 24 February 2026
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy