Open-Source Psychometrics Project
( home · about )

Bob's Burgers

The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz includes characters from the fictional universe of Bob's Burgers.

Characters

The dataset has 5 characters from this universe. They are ordered in the list below by their notability (see Note 1).

Notability Name
82.4Louise Belcher
72.2Linda Belcher
67.9Bob Belcher
64.4Gene Belcher
55.1Tina Belcher

To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.

Viewership

The graph below shows what percent of people selected this universe as something they knew well enough to rate characters from by the age of the user (for users between 13 and 60 years of age).
0%
30%
13
20
30
40
50
60

Rating

As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Bob's Burgers?". The distribution of their responses are below.

# Response Count
1 It's the worst 34
2 It's bad 33
3 It's okay 1068
4 It's good 4162
5 It's my favorite 1274

This gives it an average score of 4.01 / 5. Making it 106th out of the 342 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.

The average rating may be hard to generalize though, the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.

There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:

Gender Average rating
Male 3.92
Female 4.02

The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below show the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.

Item Correlation with rating n
nurturing (not poisonous)0.09866966
nerd (not jock)0.07987016
loyal (not traitorous)0.07557194
altruistic (not selfish)0.07146980
mature (not juvenile)0.0663716
indulgent (not sober)0.0556966
disarming (not creepy)0.05276994
deep (not shallow)0.04457109
creative (not conventional)0.04027202
genuine (not sarcastic)0.04013811
reasonable (not deranged)0.03997028
reclusive (not social)0.03436974
angelic (not demonic)0.03256972
beta (not alpha)0.03036960
blue-collar (not ivory-tower)0.02936952
feminine (not masculine)0.02777215
intimate (not formal)0.02517071
tame (not wild)0.02443752
genius (not dunce)0.01817083
stylish (not slovenly)0.01667067
emotional (not logical)0.01647184
artistic (not scientific)0.01643952
feisty (not gracious)0.01516972
obedient (not rebellious)0.01437069
awkward (not charming)0.01147200
low-tech (not high-tech)0.01113801
arcane (not mainstream)0.00826987
lenient (not strict)0.00787133
lavish (not frugal)0.00766968
adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud)0.0076985
sheriff (not outlaw)0.00676969
spiritual (not skeptical)0.00627159
orderly (not chaotic)0.00577078
haunted (not blissful)0.00563715
meek (not bossy)0.00347004
stinky (not fresh)0.00126971

How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are:

Notes

  1. Notability is computed as the average of 204: important (not irrelevant) and 401: main character (not side character).
  Updated: 15 February 2023
  Feedback: info@openpsychometrics.org
  Copyright: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
  Privacy policy