The dataset of the Statistical "Which Character" Personality Quiz (SWCPQ) includes characters from the fictional universe of Atlas Shrugged. The SWCPQ can operate as a "What Atlas Shrugged character are you?" test, click the link above to access it. This page aggregates the crowd sourced data that the quiz is built upon.
| Notability | Name |
|---|---|
| 87.3 | Dagny Taggart |
| 79.75 | John Galt |
| 74.65 | Henry Rearden |
| 65.2 | Francisco d'Anconia |
| 39.95 | Ellis Wyatt |
| 34.25 | James Taggart |
To see how each character was rated by users, view their individual page.
As part of the survey where they rated characters, users were also asked the question "How do you rate Atlas Shrugged?". The distribution of their responses are below.
| # | Response | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | It's the worst | 193 |
| 2 | It's bad | 172 |
| 3 | It's okay | 593 |
| 4 | It's good | 588 |
| 5 | It's my favorite | 146 |
This gives it an average score of 3.19 / 5. Making it 365th out of the 369 universes in the dataset ordered by rating.
The average rating may be hard to generalize, though; the users of one online personality quiz could not be representative of the population in important ways. And there are some very obvious things you can point to: users of this quiz are more likely to be young and more likely to be women.
There are several different ways that average ratings can be broken down. Here are average scores by gender:
| Gender | Average rating |
|---|---|
| Male | 3.23 |
| Female | 3.16 |
The responses to the personality quiz can also be cross referenced with the universe ratings to see how personality affects it. The table below shows the correlation between a user's response to a specific self report item and their rating of this universe.
| Item | Correlation with rating | n |
|---|---|---|
| strict (not lenient) | 0.1311 | 1742 |
| genius (not dunce) | 0.1302 | 1715 |
| scientific (not artistic) | 0.13 | 1388 |
| orderly (not chaotic) | 0.1251 | 1722 |
| deep (not shallow) | 0.1239 | 1727 |
| sheriff (not outlaw) | 0.119 | 1689 |
| logical (not emotional) | 0.1186 | 1739 |
| alpha (not beta) | 0.1181 | 1692 |
| blissful (not haunted) | 0.1065 | 1322 |
| sober (not indulgent) | 0.0988 | 1687 |
| reasonable (not deranged) | 0.0946 | 1709 |
| fresh (not stinky) | 0.09 | 1697 |
| adventurous (not stick-in-the-mud) | 0.0744 | 1691 |
| genuine (not sarcastic) | 0.0737 | 1337 |
| disarming (not creepy) | 0.0736 | 1694 |
| selfish (not altruistic) | 0.0732 | 1687 |
| charming (not awkward) | 0.0706 | 1754 |
| spiritual (not skeptical) | 0.0702 | 1726 |
| mature (not juvenile) | 0.0668 | 1310 |
| ivory-tower (not blue-collar) | 0.0656 | 1697 |
| bossy (not meek) | 0.0653 | 1700 |
| loyal (not traitorous) | 0.0625 | 1737 |
| stylish (not slovenly) | 0.0602 | 1711 |
| masculine (not feminine) | 0.0601 | 1760 |
| angelic (not demonic) | 0.0528 | 1691 |
| conventional (not creative) | 0.0458 | 1754 |
| nurturing (not poisonous) | 0.0407 | 1690 |
| gracious (not feisty) | 0.0404 | 1690 |
| obedient (not rebellious) | 0.0283 | 1706 |
| jock (not nerd) | 0.0207 | 1704 |
| intimate (not formal) | 0.0176 | 1702 |
| tame (not wild) | 0.0126 | 1334 |
| high-tech (not low-tech) | 0.0103 | 1338 |
| arcane (not mainstream) | 0.0087 | 1701 |
| frugal (not lavish) | 0.0076 | 1693 |
| social (not reclusive) | 0.0073 | 1692 |
How these items predict the ratings for this universe can be compared to how the same items predict the ratings of other universes. The universes with the most similar patterns on the predictors are: